• Register
  • Login

Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal

  1. Home
  2. Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Perianal Fistula

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Copyrights and Licensing

Home

About Journal

Aim and Scope

Editorial Board

Peer Review Process

Copyrights and Licensing

Indexing and Abstracting

Plagiarism Policy

Author's Guide

Article processing charge (APC)

Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Perianal Fistula

    Authors

    • Ali Hussein Al-Dharob 1
    • Mohammed Abd Kadhim 2

    1 Radiology, Al-Imamian Al-Kadhimyian Medical City - Baghdad- Iraq.

    2 Radiology, The Iraqi Board for Medical Specializations, Baghdad- Iraq.

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.52573/ipmj.2024.182887
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • Export Citation
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

 
BACKGROUND:
and other inflammatory diseases of the anusand perianal soft tissues area cause perianal fistulas substantial morbidity.Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a great role in the evaluation of anal fistulae.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the value of DWI in the examination of perianal fistula.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
The study included 38 patients (30 males and 8 females) with clinical suspicion of perianal fistula. It was done in MRI department (3.0T) of AL-Imamain AL-Kadhimyianmedical city, Baghdad/ Iraq during the period from November 2020 to January 2021. MRI images were assessed for the presence of visible fistulas, internal openings, secondary extension, horse shoe and abscess.
RESULTS:
68.4% of the fistulas were at Lt. side and 31.6% in the Rt. Side. Intra-sphincteric was 63.2%, trans-sphincteric was 31.6% and supra-sphinctericwas 5.3%. The primary tract detection rate at T1 was 81.6%, at T2 was 92.1%. The internal opening, the detection rate in T1 was only 10.5%, at T2  was 21.1%, at T2 Fat was 81.6%, T1+contrast was 63.2%, at DWI was 89.5% and T2 Fat+DWI was 100%. (P< 0.001. The detection rates at T2 fat sat, T1+contrast, DWI and T2 fat sat+DWI were 100%, 89.5%, 86.6% and 100%, respectively, indicating a higher detection rate at T2 sequence and T2 fat sat+DWI, with highly significant differences (p<0.001). According to the detection rates reported above, the best accuracy rate in combined T2 Fat+DWI, (P< 0.001, highly significant).
CONCLUSION:
Both DWI and CE sequences have high accuracy in the diagnosis and detecting complications of PAF. The combined FS-T2W + DWI and FST2W + CE data sets have equal sensitivity and specificity, and the use of the combined FS-T2W + DWI data set can prevent unnecessary use of contrast agent and prevent both cost and contrast-related complications.

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • Perianal fistula
  • XML
  • PDF 259.96 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
References
  1. Maher A. Abbas, Christopher H. Jackson BS, Philip I. Haigh Predictors of Outcome for Anal Fistula Surgery. Arch Surg 2011;146:1011-16.
  2. Mitidieri V, Iribarren C, Benati ML, Yaccaro CA. Abdomen. En: Ferraina P, Oria A, editores. Cirugía de Michans. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo; Revista Argentina de Radiología 2002:878-92.
  3. de Miguel Criado J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF, del Hoyo LF, Velasco LG, de lasVacas MI, et al. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics. 2012;32: 175-94.
  4. Chen, Qin; Li, Yufei; Wang, Xiaofeng; Li, Huashan Hot topics in global perianal fistula research A scopus-based bibliometric analysis Medicine: 2020; 99 :e19659.
  5. Sainio P. Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann ChirGynaecol. 1984;73:219- 24.
  6. Hamadani A, Haigh PI, Liu I-LA, Abbas MA. Who is at risk fordeveloping chronic anal fistula or recurrent anal sepsis after initial perianal abscess? Dis. Colon Rectum. 2009 ;52:217–21.
  7. Schwartz DA,  Loftus  EV,  Jr,  Tremaine  WJ,  Panaccione  R, Harmsen  WS,  Zinsmeister  AR,  et    The  natural  history  of fistulizingCrohn‘s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:875-80.
  8. Hellers G, Bergstrand O, Ewerth S, Holmström B. Occurrence and outcome after primary treatment of anal fistulae in Crohn‘s disease. Gut. 1980;21:525–27.
  9. Karban A, Itay M, Davidovich O, Leshinsky-Silver E, Kimmel G, Fidder H, et al. Risk factors for perianal Crohn‘s disease: the role of genotype, phenotype, and ethnicity. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1702-8.
  10. Lohsiriwat V, Yodying H, Lohsiriwat D. Incidence and factors influencing the development of fistula-in-ano after incision and drainage of perianal abscesses. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 ;93:61-65.
  11. Lewis RT, Bleier JI. Surgical treatment of anorectalcrohn disease. Clinics in colon and rectal surgery. 2013;26:90-99.
  12. Khera PS, Badawi HA, Afifi AH. MRI in perianal fistulae. The Indian journal of radiology & imaging. 2010 ;20:53.
  13. Marco Sanz AG, Paradela MM, Moreno EF. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics. 2011;32:175-94.
  14. Kim Y, Park YJ. Three-dimensional endoanalultrasonographic assessment of an anal fistula with and without H (2) O (2) enhancement. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4810-15.
  15. Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1985; 28:103-4.
  16. Cadeddu F, Salis F, Lisi G, Ciangola I, Milito G. Complex anal fistula remains a challenge for colorectal surgeon. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30:595–603.
  17. Algazzar HY, Eldib DB, Bahram MA, Zaher NA. Preoperative MRI of perianal fistula evaluation and its impact on surgical outcome. Egypt J RadiolNucl Med. 2019;50.
  18. Yoshizako T, Wada A, Takahara T, et al. Diffusion- weighted MRI for evaluating perianal fistula activity: feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2049–53.
  19. Mohsen LA, Osman NM. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of perianal fistula and abscess. Egypt J RadiolNucl Med. 2020;51.
  20. Baba Y, Weerakkody Y. Perianal fistula. Radiopedia. 2020;18:1-10.
  21. Singh K, Singh N, Thukral C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of perianal fistulae with surgical correlation. J ClinDiagn Res 2014;8: 1-4.
  22. Karanikas I, Koutserimpas C, Siaperas P, Skarpas A, Karoubalis J, Velimezis G Transrectal ultrasonography of perianal fistulas: a single center experience from a surgeon's point of view. G Chir. 2018;39:258–60.
  23. Cavusoglu M, Duran S, SözmenClllz D, Tufan G, HatipogluÇetin HG, Ozsoy A, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of perianal fistula. DiagnInterv Imaging. 2017;98:401–8.
  24. Aslan S. Added value of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI data sets for characterization of perianal fistulas; single center experience. Ann Med Res. 2020;27:2763.

 

    • Article View: 243
    • PDF Download: 101
Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal
Volume 23, Issue 1
January 2024
Page 67-72
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 259.96 K
Share
Export Citation
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 243
  • PDF Download: 101

APA

Al-Dharob, A., & Kadhim, M. (2024). Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Perianal Fistula. Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 23(1), 67-72. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2024.182887

MLA

Ali Hussein Al-Dharob; Mohammed Abd Kadhim. "Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Perianal Fistula". Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 23, 1, 2024, 67-72. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2024.182887

HARVARD

Al-Dharob, A., Kadhim, M. (2024). 'Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Perianal Fistula', Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 23(1), pp. 67-72. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2024.182887

VANCOUVER

Al-Dharob, A., Kadhim, M. Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Perianal Fistula. Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2024; 23(1): 67-72. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2024.182887

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Glossary
  • Sitemap

News

This work is licensed under          CC BY 4.0    

 

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com