Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Copyrights and Licensing

Home

About Journal

Aim and Scope

Editorial Board

Peer Review Process

Copyrights and Licensing

Indexing and Abstracting

Plagiarism Policy

Author's Guide

Article processing charge (APC)

Proximal Hypospadias Repair Straightening and Closure (STAC) vs Straightening and Graft (STAG), Initial Stage Outcome; A Comparative Study

,

Document Type : Review Article

Abstract

Background: Proximal hypospadias with severe ventral curvature represent a challenge to surgeons, to correct different degrees of curvature whilst reconstructing the urethra with the best possible aesthetic outcome and least possible number of complications.

Objective: To compare the outcome of straightening and grafting procedure in STAC vs STAG, in proximal hypospadias repair surgery in terms of recurrent curvature, graft take, and graft contracture.

Methods: Twenty-two male patients with proximal hypospadias associated with ventral curvature, undergone staged repair with oral buccal mucosa as a graft, divided randomly into 2 groups; group A, (STAC) repair (9 patients), and group B, (STAG) repair (13 patients), from November 2019 to November 2021. Ventral penile straightening procedure had been performed in form of urethral plate transection and 3 ventral corporotomies. Graft inserted at 2nd stage in STAC group after healing of corporotomy incisions, while directly inserted over the incisions in STAG group at 1st stage. Patients were followed up for 6 months for assessment of graft take, graft contracture, and recurrent curvature, which evaluated at beginning of second stage by goniometer.

Results: All patients in (STAC) repair group had straight penis with no recurrent curvature, no graft contracture was noted, whereas in (STAG) group, (2) patients had minor ventral curvature of 15° which is corrected at beginning of 2nd stage, and (1) patient had partial graft contracture which was managed by local betamethasone. The graft took successfully in all patients of both groups.

Conclusions: STAC and STAG repair for proximal hypospadias achieved successful and adequate straightening of severe ventral curvature degrees, with a slight advantage for STAC repair in terms of graft contracture and recurrent curvature, as the graft inserted over a completely healed smooth corpora in comparison to STAG in which graft inserted over a raw open corporotomies.

Keywords: Hypospadias, Curvature, Straightening, Graft.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Snodgrass W. and Bush N. Hypospadias. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbell–Walsh urology. 11th edition. Volume 4. Elsevier philadelphia; 2016: 3399-429.
  2. Baskin LS, Ebbers MB. Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2006; 41:463-72.
  3. Keane T, Graham S. Glenn's Urologic Surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016: chapter 98.
  4. Partin A, Campbell M, Walsh P, Wein Alan J. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021:909.
  5. Snodgrass W, Bush N. Staged tubularized autograft repair for primary proximal hypospadias with 30-degree or greater ventral curvature. The Journal of urology. 2017;198:680-86.
  6. Wilcox D, Thomas D. Essentials of Pediatric Urology. 3rd ed. Taylor and Francis; 2021:209-26.
  7. Yachia D. Hypospadias. In: Yachia D. Text atlas of penile surgery. 1st edition. Informa health UK; 2007: 83-106.
  8. Badawy H, Dawood W, Soliman AS, Fahmy A, Mahfouz W, Moussa A, Assem A, Eid AA, Elsayed S, Gawan A, Hanno A. Staged repair of proximal hypospadias: reporting outcome of staged tubularized autograft repair (STAG). Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2020;55:2710-16.
  9. Snodgrass WT. Flap versus graft 2-stage repair of severe hypospadias with chordee. The Journal of urology. 2015;193:760-61.
  10. Snodgrass W, Bush NC. Persistent or recurrent ventral curvature after failed proximal hypospadias repair. Journal of pediatric urology. 2019;15:344-e1.
  11. Snodgrass WT, Bush NC. Management of urethral strictures after hypospadias repair. Urologic Clinics. 2017;44:105-11.
  12. Castagnetti M, Zhapa E, Rigamonti W. Primary Severe Hypospadias: Comparison of Reoperation Rates and Parental Perception of Urinary Symptoms and Cosmetic Outcomes among 4 Repairs. The Journal of Urology. 2013;189:1508-13.
  13. Cruz-Diaz O, Castellan M, Gosalbez R. Use of Buccal Mucosa in Hypospadias Repair. Current Urology Reports. 2013;14:366-72.
  14. Leslie B, Lorenzo A, Figueroa V, Moore K, Farhat W, Bägli D. Critical Outcome Analysis of Staged Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty for Prior Failed Hypospadias Repair in Children. The Journal of Urology. 2011;185:1077-82.
  15. Johal N, Nitkunan T, O'Malley K, Cuckow P. The Two-Stage Repair for Severe Primary Hypospadias. European Urology 2006; 50:366-371. Johal N, Nitkunan T, O'Malley K, Cuckow P. The Two-Stage Repair for Severe Primary Hypospadias. European Urology 2006;50:366-71.
  16. Faure A, Bouty A, Nyo Y, O'Brien M, Heloury Y. Two-stage graft urethroplasty for proximal and complicated hypospadias in children: A retrospective study. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2016;12:286.e1-286.e7.
  17. Pfistermüller KL, Manoharan S, Desai D, Cuckow PM. Two-stage hypospadias repair with a free graft for severe primary and revision hypospadias: a single surgeon's experience with long-term follow-up. Journal of pediatric urology. 2017;13:35-e1.
  18. Snodgrass W, Bush N and Cost N. Algorithm for Comprehensive Approach to Hypospadias Reoperation Using 3 Techniques. The Journal of Urology 2009;182:2885-92.
Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal
Volume 24, Issue 2
April 2025
Page 273-282
Files
Share
Export Citation
Statistics