• Register
  • Login

Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal

  1. Home
  2. Evaluation of Holmium: YAG Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy for the Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy of the Ureteric Stones

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Copyrights and Licensing

Home

About Journal

Aim and Scope

Editorial Board

Peer Review Process

Copyrights and Licensing

Indexing and Abstracting

Plagiarism Policy

Author's Guide

Article processing charge (APC)

Evaluation of Holmium: YAG Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy for the Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy of the Ureteric Stones

    Author

    • Saad Dakhil Farhan
,
  • Article Information
  • Download
  • Export Citation
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND :
Ureteroscopy (URS) is a precise, minimally invasive surgical intervention that can assess the entire collecting system to treat a stone using intracorporeal lithotripsy.The implication of laser technology in the development of lithotripter fibres has revolutionised intracorporeal lithotripsy. OBJECTIVE:
To compare the efficacy and safety of Holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithoclast in treating ureteric calculi.
METHODS:
The study included total of 65 patients divided into two groups of laser lithotripsy (LL) (25 patients) and pneumatic lithoclast (PL)(40 patients). Inclusion criteria were patients with a single ureteric stone of size 0.7cm-2.0 cm. Stone size was determined with pre op CT scan. A 8 French rigid ureteroscope was used for all cases. Holmium: YAG laser with 600 μm wide fiber size was employed in laser group and frequency was set at 8 Hz at a power of 1.2 joule.Pneumotic lithoclast with used in PL group. Postoperatively patients underwent radiography and helical CT as required to asses stone clearance.
RESULTS:
The mean patient age , the male to female ratio , stone size and site were similar between the two groups. Mean operative time in LL group was 35.5 minutes as compared to 25.7 minutes in PL group, the Stone migration up in pelvicalyceal system occurred in one patients(4%) of LL group while in nine patients(22.5%) of PL group. Double J (DJ) Stent was placed in 9 (36%) patients in LL group where as 17(42%) patients required it in PL group. Stone free rate at 4 weeks was 84% in LL group as compared to 72.5% in PL group. CONCLUSION:
Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy is a superior technology compared to pneumatic lithoclast in terms of rate of stone clearance and complications especially in upper ureteric stones.

Keywords

  • intracorporeal lithotripsy
  • Laser lithotripsy
  • pneumotic lithotripsy
  • Ureteric stone
  • XML
  • PDF 0 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
    • Article View: 363
    • PDF Download: 116
Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal
Volume 11, Issue 0
February 2012
Page 668-674
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 0 K
Share
Export Citation
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 363
  • PDF Download: 116

APA

Dakhil Farhan, S. (2012). Evaluation of Holmium: YAG Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy for the Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy of the Ureteric Stones. Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 11(0), 668-674.

MLA

Saad Dakhil Farhan. "Evaluation of Holmium: YAG Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy for the Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy of the Ureteric Stones". Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 11, 0, 2012, 668-674.

HARVARD

Dakhil Farhan, S. (2012). 'Evaluation of Holmium: YAG Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy for the Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy of the Ureteric Stones', Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 11(0), pp. 668-674.

VANCOUVER

Dakhil Farhan, S. Evaluation of Holmium: YAG Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy for the Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy of the Ureteric Stones. Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2012; 11(0): 668-674.

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Glossary
  • Sitemap

News

This work is licensed under          CC BY 4.0    

 

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com